From:	SMTP%"hasan@state.demon.co.uk"  1-JUL-1993 08:34:25.54
To:	EVERHART
CC:	
Subj:	Re: a "new" bug; and a related question. 

X-Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
From: hasan@state.demon.co.uk (Hasan Ali)
Subject: Re: a "new" bug; and a related question. 
Distribution: world
Organization: State Modules LTD
Reply-To: hasan@state.demon.co.uk
X-Mailer: Simple NEWS 1.90 (ka9q DIS 1.19)
Lines: 23
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1993 13:46:54 +0000
Message-Id: <741448014snz@state.demon.co.uk>
Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk
To: Info-VAX@kl.sri.com
X-Gateway-Source-Info: USENET

In article <1993Jun29.110116.1@woods.ulowell.edu> welchb@woods.ulowell.edu writes:

>2) During the attempt to find remote or hidden causes for all this, I ran
>into something new which I do not find in the gray wall.
>$DIR/SEC SYSMGR.DIR     yields
>        (APPLICATION,SIZE=%D28,FLAGS=%X0C03,ACCESS=%X000001DD,DATA=%X00000002,
>        %X00000200,%X000003D0,%XF83A8C00,%X0092605C)
>This is due to that part of /SEC which is really /ACL.  In no other place
>where we have ACL's does that output take that form; it always looks like
>the way the book shows.  Does anyone wish to comment on the translation?
>-- 
>Brendan Welch, UMass/Lowell, W1LPG,  welchb@woods.ulowell.edu
>

You (or someone) has set up RMS file monitoring on this file (directory!)
You can examine the output by 

$ mon rms/file=sysmgr.dir

The whys and wherefores of the acl are not documented.

-- 
Hasan Ali